Jan 13

Bill C12 and the Manufactured Crisis of Migration

The federal government claims it is restoring balance to the immigration system. In reality it is dismantling pathways that thousands of migrant workers refugees and international students relied on in good faith. Bill C12 now moving toward Senate review is not an administrative adjustment. It is a political decision to make life more precarious for people who already carry the heaviest burdens of this economy.

Ottawa has announced its intention to reduce temporary resident volumes to less than five percent of the population by 2027. Behind this neutral language lie brutal cuts. Student visas have been slashed by more than half. In 2026 only 155000 study permits will be issued compared to a planned 437000 in 2025. Temporary worker admissions are also collapsing. The government will accept 230000 this year which is more than 135000 fewer than last year. Refugee admissions are being trimmed as well with only 56200 refugees and protected persons expected this year.

These numbers are not just statistics. They represent people who came here with hope who paid thousands in fees who worked in warehouses farms care homes and kitchens and who were promised that effort would open doors. As immigration advocate Jain explains many students came in good faith worked after graduation and are now being told to leave. The ethical response would have been to transition them to permanent status not discard them when the labour is extracted.

Bill C12 hardens this betrayal into law. It bars people from filing a refugee claim if they have been in Canada for more than a year. It gives the federal government sweeping power to stop accepting new immigration applications and even cancel existing ones in the name of the so called public interest. This is not about fixing inefficiencies. It is about building a system where migrant lives can be erased by administrative order.

The government argues that this bill is needed to protect the asylum system. Experts disagree. Anna Triandafyllidou the Canada Excellence Research Chair in migration and integration states clearly that Canada already has a strong asylum system that considers how long people have been in the country and under what status. The measures in Bill C12 are not necessary. They are ideological.

This bill replaces elements of the earlier Bill C2 which faced strong opposition from the NDP and migrant rights organizations across the country. That opposition was not abstract. It came from workers who know what it means to live with closed work permits employer tied visas and constant fear of deportation. It came from refugees who survived war only to face new walls at the border of paperwork and deadlines.

For migrant workers the consequences are severe. Fewer admissions mean employers will continue to hold power over a shrinking pool of desperate workers. With no credible pathway to permanent status and with the threat of application cancellation hanging over their heads workers will be less likely to speak up about abuse theft of wages or unsafe conditions. Precarity is not an accident of this system. It is the product.

For refugees the one year filing bar is devastating. Many people arrive traumatized isolated or misinformed. They spend months trying to survive finding shelter learning the language or escaping exploitation. Under Bill C12 that time becomes a weapon against them. Miss the deadline and your right to seek protection vanishes.

The Migrant Workers Centre rejects the logic of Bill C12. Canada does not face a migration crisis. It faces a crisis of political courage. Our economy depends on migrant labour yet our laws are designed to keep migrants temporary disposable and silent.

Real reform would start by recognizing migrant workers and students as future members of our communities. It would expand permanent residence not restrict it. It would protect the right to claim asylum not erase it. And it would end employer tied permits that turn exploitation into a business model.

Bill C12 is not about public interest. It is about protecting a system that profits from insecurity. Migrant workers refugees and international students deserve better than a revolving door of broken promises.

Related Posts

Five Years After Quebec’s Health and Safety Reform, Workers Demand Real Change

On October 6, the Immigrant Workers Centre (IWC-CTI) took part in a rally outside the offices of the CNESST at Complexe Desjardins in Montreal, marking five years since Quebec’s occupational health and safety reform came into force. The mobilization brought together members of the CSD, CSN, CSQ, FTQ and UTTAM, along with organizations defending workers’ rights. Their message was clear: the review of the 2021 reform must not be reduced... Read more →
Marchers walk down the streets of Montreal while making calls for justice. Photo Dorothy Mombrun

Every Child Matters, Hundreds March in Montreal for Truth and Reconciliation

By Marie and Yusrah On September 30, 2026, in Tiohtià–Mooniyang–Montreal, several hundred people gathered to mark the National Day for Truth and Reconciliation by taking part in the Every Child Matters march, organized by the Native Women’s Shelter of Montreal. Many of those present, across generations, wore orange shirts to honour survivors and victims of the residential school system, as well as their families and loved ones. The march began... Read more →

Parc Ex community holds first assembly as part of the growing campaign to resist deportations

DEBOUT CONTRE LES DEPORTATIONS - Parc Ex holds its first public assembly as part of the growing campaign to fight deportations in each neighborhood (the below summary notes were provided by Koby Rogers Hall - artist-researcher at the IWC - on September 27 @ 7000 ave du Parc. Names of certain individuals redacted) Edited and contributions from Mostafa Henaway, IWC organiser and mobilisation in Parc Ex. On September 27, 2026,... Read more →

Quebec’s Election and the Politics of Scapegoating Migrants

As Quebec approaches its October 5 election, right-wing parties are not only competing over taxes, public services, or the economy. Another, more dangerous competition is taking place: who can appear tougher on migrants and religious minorities, and who can go further in using the language of “protecting Quebec’s identity” and “secularism” to justify exclusion? This is happening while working-class families face a housing crisis, a rising cost of living, and... Read more →